NewsExpress

NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump issued a warning to the Republican National Committee’s chairwoman in an interview aired Sunday, saying when asked about her that there would “probably be some changes made.”

Trump had been asked by Fox News host Maria Bartiromo about Ronna McDaniel, who has been facing withering attacks from some Trump allies, including the group Turning Point, which was part of an unsuccessful effort to oust her last year.

“I think she did great when she ran Michigan for me. I think she did OK, initially, in the RNC. I would say right now, there’ll probably be some changes made,” Trump said on FOX News Channel’s Sunday Morning Futures.

The RNC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump was also pressed on the party’s finances following campaign disclosures released this week that showed the RNC had just $8 million in the bank and $1 million in debt.

“So I have a lot of money,” Trump said in the interview that aired Sunday, arguing that “people are not looking at the RNC. They want changes.”

“You have to understand, I have nothing to do with the RNC. I’m separate,” he added.

The comments come as Trump and his allies have been pushing the party to get behind him and effectively end the primary, even though he still faces a final major rival, his former U.N. Ambassador, Nikki Haley.

McDaniel was criticized last month for saying Haley had no path to the nomination after Trump won the New Hampshire primary, telling Fox News: “We need to unite around our eventual nominee, which is going to be Donald Trump.” An effort by Trump allies to have the RNC this week declare Trump the “presumptive nominee” was withdrawn after he came out against it.

At the RNC’s winter meeting in Las Vegas Friday, McDaniel, who won a fourth two-year term last year, called for the party to unite behind the goal of defeating President Joe Biden.

“We Republicans will stick together, as united as the union our party long ago fought to preserve,” McDaniel said, quoting Ronald Reagan, according to people who were in the room and disclosed her remarks on condition of anonymity to discuss a private gathering.

While Trump and the RNC worked hand-in-hand on his losing 2020 bid, they have disagreed on a number of issues this time around. Trump refused to sign the party’s loyalty pledge, skipped all of its sanctioned primary debates and has continued to cast suspicion on early and mail-in voting, even as the RNC pursues a “Bank Your Vote” initiative aimed at encouraging both.

Trump, in the interview, also continued to push the party to rally behind him and at one point claimed Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, who has been deeply critical of the former president since he left office, is interested in joining his growing list of endorsements.

“I think Mitch McConnell wants to endorse me, that’s what I hear,” he alleged, adding. “Everybody’s getting in line. They’re all getting on board.”

Representatives for McConnell did not immediately respond to requests for comment. McConnell has made a point of staying out of the primary, but previously said he would support the eventual nominee.

In the summer of September 2013, a handful of journalists with close ties to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard were summoned to a secretive ceremony in an aircraft hangar.

Waiting for them in the hangar on a pea-green floor, which looked a bit like a repurposed school gymnasium, were two brand new aircraft in white and blue livery, marked with the number “129”.

To the journalists charged with taking photographs of that new kit, ahead of a big announcement by the Revolutionary Guard, it may have felt like just another routine assignment.

But this was no ordinary plane: this was the Shahed [Witness in Persian], a deadly long-range drone that in the decade to come would wreak havoc across the Middle East and beyond.

‘Iran’s most strategic unmanned plane’

“Our scientists, through scientific struggle, have built Iran’s most strategic unmanned plane,” declared General Mohammad Ali Jafari, then the commander-in-chief of the Revolutionary Guard. “This smart technology can do the job of thousands of soldiers, military posts and border guards… and protect the security of the borders.”

It was a bold claim for a regime with a reputation for building dubious imitations of superior Western drones; in 2011, the Iranians had also managed to capture a US RQ-170 which was reverse engineered some years later to make another drone in the Iranian fleet, the Simorgh.

This time, however, General Jafari was proven right, as the Shahed became what one expert has called the “AK-47” of Tehran: cheap, mass produced and ready to be exported worldwide to conflict zones where the regime has a vested interest.

The menace of the Shahed was underlined this week after it was, according to US officials, unleashed on their desert outpost of Tower 22 in Jordan.

Emitting its distinctive, lawnmower-like whirr, the drone was launched by an Iranian-backed militia group in Iraq and somehow evaded US air defences before crashing into the barracks, killing three US soldiers and injuring a further 25.

The next day, US TV screens were broadcasting the names, ranks, ages and photographs of the slain troops – Specialist Breonna Alexsondria Moffett, 23, Specialist Kennedy Ladon Sanders, 24, and Sergeant William Jerome Rivers, 46 – as they did during the darker days of the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns. It was the moment that the latest war in the Middle East was brought home to America.

‘Most deadly attack since Oct 17’

US officials called it the “the most deadly attack since Oct 17”, the date when armed groups across the Middle East started attacking US forces in retaliation for Israel’s ongoing war with Hamas. It was also, they said, an “an escalation of significance” – raising the spectre of direct conflict with Iran.

The Shahed had been used many times by Iranian proxies before in the Middle East, notably by Houthi militia groups who relied on it against the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen, and more recently in a string of attacks on Western commercial ships in the Red Sea. The Syrian regime’s drone fleet is also reported to include Shaheds.

A Shahed-136 drone was, according to US officials, used in the notorious July 2021 drone attack by Iran on the Mercer Street vessel in the Red Sea, which killed a Romanian sailor and a British security guard.

Perhaps most significantly, it is being exported en masse to Russia for use in Vladimir Putin’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine as part of a shadowy new security alliance with Moscow.

In Ukraine, the sound of a Shahed grumbling through the skies signals an imminent explosion and, frequently, civilian casualties. Fitted with warheads of up to 50kg and with a range of up to 2,000 kilometres, the Russians have mainly been relying on Shaheds to attack energy grids and grain storehouses.

A September 2023 report by Airwars, a British investigative news website, found that nearly 2,000 Shaheds have been launched at Ukraine from Russia since that month.

Iranian drones attractive to Russia

Ulrike Franke, a drone expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said Iranian drones like the Shahed were particularly attractive to Russia because they were already battle-tested in the Middle East and easy to ship in huge quantities.

“Iran has a long history of building these smaller and less sophisticated drones and testing them around the world,” she said. “What is surprising is the sheer numbers, they are giving out hundreds and hundreds which were either quickly produced or already in their arsenal.”

Experts like Dr Franke stress that drones are not strategic weapons, in the sense of being able to decide the overall outcome of the war in Ukraine. However, “they bring an element of surprise that other elements cannot – they are a nuisance to the point it can become a new problem.”

They are also a drain on the enemy’s resources, she added: “The munition used to shoot them down tends to be more expensive than the drone itself.”

Ukrainian forces have also been hard at work developing EV [electronic warfare] solutions to incoming drones, such as jamming their GPS so they cannot reach their target. Then there are the old fashioned, and sometimes most effective, methods – such as putting up huge nets around a base to block small aircraft.

As for the attack in Jordan on US troops, some reports suggest this was more a case of a US security failure than an Iranian triumph; staff on the base may have mistaken the Shahed for a US drone and allowed it to pass.

While the Iranian regime admits to sending the drones to Russia – after initial denials – Russia continues to brand them as a domestic “Geran” drone model.

Russia ran out of Shahed drones just a few months after Iran began the supplies in spring 2022, prompting the Kremlin to look for ways to ramp up production and, if possible, set up the manufacturing locally.

Roped into building drones in Russia

Russian media outlet Razvorot last year reported that several hundred undergraduate students had been roped into assembling Shaheds at a production line in Alabuga in the region of Tatarstan about 1,000 kilometres east from Moscow.

Internal memos and email exchanges with Iranian partners showed that the factory floor at Alabuga is planned to be expanded from 40,000 sq. metres to 100,00 sq. metres in the next two years. Production figures were not revealed.

Unnamed students of a technical school affiliated with a local university said several hundreds of their peers, mostly underage, had been coerced into working at the factory as an extracurricular activity.

Those who tried to refuse working on the drone assembly line were reportedly threatened that they would be expelled from school and would also have to pay back the scholarship they had been given.

Students were reportedly paid around 40,000 rubles (£350) a month for assembling the drones.

As early as October 2022, Tehran reportedly sent members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to Crimea to help Russian forces use the one-way attack drones Moscow provided.

The widespread Russian use of the drones in Ukraine “provides Iran opportunities to learn valuable lessons that can be used to refine their drone designs and better employ them,” according to Bradley Bowman, senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

He added: “We see some of those same types of drones being used against American forces in the Middle East. Iranian drones are not just a problem for Ukrainians. They are a problem for Israel, the United States, and its Arab partners, too.”

Mr Bowman said: “The Shahed 136 is not exactly the most advanced drone in the world. But that’s the point, you can accomplish very significant things on the battlefield with low technology, low cost systems, especially if you can employ them in large quantities.”

“The broader implication here is that we have Iranian weapons being used in Ukraine to kill men, women and children in their homes, and then the same Iranian weapons are being used to try to kill American forces in the Middle East.”

“America’s four leading nation state adversaries are increasingly aligned and increasingly coordinating with one another to undermine us and our allies.”

“Russia and China are closer than they have been for decades. We see Chinese money flowing into Iran. That Chinese money is going to help immunise Iran to some degree against Western, US-led sanctions pressure, making it even less likely that Tehran will ever negotiate in good faith about its nuclear program.”

By the time that the Shahed was placed in Russian stockpiles, various Iranian drone models were already well integrated into the arsenals of Iran’s proxies, a vast network across the Middle East of militia groups that receive funding and expertise from Tehran.

Hezbollah has mixed ‘family’ of drones

The Houthis have relied on Shahed and Samad drones (the latter reputedly of Iranian origin) throughout the Yemen civil war, while various Iranian-backed factions in Iraq and Syria hold an unknown number of Shaheds. Israeli officials say that Hezbollah in southern Lebanon has a mixed “family” of drones, likely including models such as the Shahed.

Hamas in the Gaza Strip has a drone fleet of sorts, but it is less clear whether it contains Iranian-made models. Hamas has sporadically launched crude, possibly homemade drones in recent years, and may have used them to carry out surveillance of southern Israel prior to the Oct 7 massacre.

In all cases, however, experts say it is clear that Iranian expertise has likely supported these programmes across the Middle East.

And Iran’s drone production programme seems to be gaining pace. In August 2023, Tehran revealed a new model of the Mohajer [Immigrant in Persian], fitted with a 200 kilogram warhead, which it claimed was capable of bombing Israel “into the Stone Age.”

For Seth J. Frantzman, a Middle East security analyst and the author of Drone Wars, the mass export of these Iranian models is “already looking like nascent stages of the AK-47 trafficking of the Soviet Union.”

The Shahed itself is also starting to become a symbol of sorts for the anti-Israel factions, added Mr Frantzman. “We’re starting to see that these groups are, more and more, embracing the drone and discussing it in propaganda than they had done a few years ago.”

Long-running intelligence debate

There has been a long-running debate in intelligence circles over how much control Iran maintains over its drones, and how they are used, once they arrive in the hands of their proxies.

Mr Frantzman pointed to the assassination of Qassim Soleimani, the revered Iranian IRGC leader who was killed by the Trump Administration, as a clear sign that Tehran coordinates very closely with its proxies.

“Remember that Soleimani was killed in Baghdad airport – he was driving with the head of Kataib Hezbollah [an Iranian-backed group led by Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis], so it’s clear they were seen planning operations together,” he said.

Iran is yet to face any severe military consequences for arming the Russians and its various proxies, though a major retaliation from President Joe Biden over the attack in Jordan is expected to take place in the near future.

It will most likely take the form of an attack on Iranian or Iranian-backed forces inside Iraq, as bombing Iran itself would risk a tremendous escalation in the conflict.

Those with a more hawkish view on Iran have increased calls for direct action against the regime. They argue that for too long the West has allowed Tehran and its proxies to operate in the shadows across the Middle East with impunity – though the regime is subject to crippling sanctions over human rights abuses and its nuclear programme.

“In killing US soldiers, the regime in Iran has greatly overreached itself. It must now be put back into place,” wrote Kasra Aarabi, director of IRGC research at United Against Nuclear Iran, in a recent op-ed for the Telegraph. “This must now be remedied. Weakness emboldens the Iranian regime; strength cows it.”

A decade on from that portentous ceremony in September 2013, where the Shahed was unveiled, it has become a terror of the skies over two continents.

It could also be argued that the story of the Shahed mirrors Iran’s expanding influence across the Middle East and Europe: secretive, low-cost, and more geared towards disruption than mass-destruction.

As for General Jafari, he is now quietly retired in Iran, where he lives under US and UK sanctions – but the legacy of his “scientific struggle” drones on.

Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 3 months with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Claim:

Robin Williams once said, “Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always.”

Rating:

In January 2024, users on X shared a thought-provoking quote and attributed it to the late actor and stand-up comedian Robin Williams. The quote reads, “Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always.”

It’s certainly possible that Williams would have wholeheartedly agreed with this sentiment. Before his suicide on Aug. 11, 2014, when he wasn’t on the set to act in films and TV shows, he was living with his family as both a husband and a father, two roles in life that, like being a wife and mother, can teach a person valuable lessons.

However, unfortunate for any of Williams’ fans, we were unable to uncover any evidence to document he ever said the exact words in the quote. In this story, we’ll lay out how we came to this determination.

Unreliable Google Answers

First, we performed several Google searches. At the top of the search results, Google pointed users to an unhelpful source: a meme on Pinterest.

We don’t recommend trusting Google’s questions and answers that appear above search results. They often offer incorrect or irrelevant information.

We don’t recommend placing blind trust in the questions and answers that appear above Google search results. Such answers can sometimes offer incorrect or irrelevant information that helps no one.

Next, we decided to check Twitter by using its nifty “advanced search” feature.

The Oldest Posts

In the X app, we opened the search function and tapped the icon that showed three dots to eventually select to perform an “advanced search.” We chose to search for several of the words in the quote with Williams’ name, then scrolled down to choose a range of dates that spanned from the social media site’s founding in 2006 to the day after his death, Aug. 12, 2014. Then, we tapped to perform the search.

According to X, the earliest tweet to feature the quote next to Williams’ name came hours after his death. To us, this meant that Williams likely never said the words in the quote.

These tweets were posted hours after Williams’ death.

Some of these first several posts that are displayed in the screenshot above presented the quote as a statement related to Williams’ death without directly attributing it to him as something he had said. It likely was these sorts of posts that eventually led to other users later claiming that he had, in fact, once uttered or wrote the quote himself.

So, if Williams didn’t say these words, who did?

The sentiment expressed in the quote was one that likely had been expressed for many years in a variety of different words. It’s the kind of belief that many people might agree with, as some of our social media commenters might point out when we repost this story on Facebook and X. However, we did find one fairly close match in an article about an American soldier who died on the battlefield. That story is next.

U.S. Army Spc. Douglas Jay Green

To continue our search, we turned our attention to newspapers.com, a website whose creators published on its “About” page to be “the largest online newspaper archive.” The website’s creators also noted its massive size. Its content library consists of “862 million+ pages of historical newspapers from 27,500+ newspapers from around the United States and beyond.”

A search of the website’s archive for the exact words “fighting a battle you know nothing about” produced 158 results. We also performed a search to include the word “that,” as in, “fighting a battle that you know nothing about.”

The oldest result that the website found for both searches was from the year before Williams’ death.

On Jan. 26, 2013, author Tom Sileo wrote a story about Douglas Jay Green, a U.S. Army specialist who was killed on Aug. 28, 2011, while fighting in Afghanistan.

According to The Washington Post, whose reporting cited the Pentagon, Green was killed “when insurgents attacked his unit using a makeshift bomb and small-arms fire.”

In Sileo’s article, “The Other Fellow First,” he wrote about a letter that Green had mailed to his family not long before his death:

Sileo’s entire story is available on tomsileo.com.

At first, we believed our search for the origins of the quote in question may have ended. Then, we remembered the old, reliable Google Books website, the search engine that can scan through text for what seems like every known piece of literature that exists in the world today.

Google Books Points to 2009

Our search of Google Books found one helpful result.

In 2009, author Darielys Tejera published the book, “Absolutely Nothing.” It contained what might be the oldest written work with the exact words “fighting a battle you know nothing about.”

The passage in Tejera’s book makes mention of suicide, the same fate later suffered by Williams:

This fact check will be updated should we uncover any other data about the history of the quote.

Note: The quote about “the heart afraid of breaking” was attributed in Tejera’s book to another work titled, “The Four Agreements,” by author Don Miguel Ruiz in 1997. It originally came from “The Rose,” a song written by Amanda McBroom that was later popularized by Bette Midler.

Sources:

“Army Spc. Douglas J. Green.” Military Times, https://thefallen.militarytimes.com/army-spc-douglas-j-green/6567958.

Borden, Jeremy. “Army Spec. Douglas J. Green Fondly Remembered as ‘Old Soul.'” Washington Post, 14 Sept. 2011, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/army-spec-douglas-j-green-fondly-remembered-as-old-soul/2011/09/14/gIQAMX23SK_story.html.

Sileo, Tom. “Service to Others Guided Soldier, His Mother Says.” The Park City Daily News via Newspapers.Com, Sunday Reader, 27 Jan. 2013, pp. 1, 3, https://www.newspapers.com/image/663718642/.

—. “The Other Fellow First.” TomSileo.Com, 26 Jan. 2013, https://www.tomsileo.com/2013/01/the-other-fellow-first.html.

Tejera, Darielys. Absolutely Nothing. Xlibris Corporation, 2009.

By Svea Herbst-Bayliss

(Reuters) -Billionaire investor Bill Ackman, who led a campaign criticizing Harvard University as it has been rocked by turmoil over practices related to antisemitism, plagiarism and financial management, on Friday failed in a bid to get four candidates on the ballot for a governing board of the Ivy League school.

One other candidate backed by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg also failed to win a place on the ballot for Harvard’s board of overseers.

The two men, who acted independently, threw support behind the candidates after Harvard President Claudine Gay resigned last month amid criticism of her handling of antisemitism on campus in the wake of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel, and claims of plagiarism in her earlier academic career.

Gay and Harvard have denied the allegations. Gay, who was Harvard’s first Black president, said in a statement at the time that stepping down was in the best interest of the Ivy League school given the controversy.

The board of overseers is the school’s second-highest governing body, with the power to approve or reject the hiring of Harvard’s president. Each year, five seats on the 30-member board are up for election, and only Harvard alumni are eligible to vote.

Some of the candidates said that Harvard informed them late on Friday that they did not meet the required threshold to get on the ballot. Zoe Bedell, one of four candidates backed by Ackman, said she, Alec Williams, Logan Leslie and Julia Pollak received between 2,300 and 2,700 votes each. Sam Lessin, the candidate backed by Zuckerberg, said Harvard told him he received 2,901 votes. Securing a spot on the ballot required 3,238 votes.

The vote for the board occurs later this year.

The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ballot results.

Ackman also did not respond to a request for comment.

Ackman, who attended Harvard as an undergraduate and for business school and has donated about $50 million to the university, has been among the most vocal critics of Gay and her management on campus. He told Reuters earlier this year that Harvard needs change and the slate he backed would bring fresh blood to the board.

The Harvard Alumni Association interviews and puts forward candidates to a vote, and those who want to get on the ballot without the association’s blessing — as the candidates supported by Zuckerberg and Ackman attempted — face long odds.

In 2016, Harvard increased the number of signatures needed to get on the ballot when not endorsed by the association from 200 to 1% of those who were entitled to vote in the previous election.

Harvard has argued that keeping nominations wide open lets special interests hijack the process, akin to political campaigns.

A MESSAGE THAT “RESONATED”

Lawrence Summers, a former Harvard president and former U.S. Treasury secretary, earlier this week spoke in favor of dissident candidates. “Everyone who can, should support challenges to Harvard’s traditional leadership from Sam Lessin, Harvey Silverglate, Alec Williams and others,” he wrote on social media platform X.

Zuckerberg, who dropped out of Harvard to launch Facebook in 2004 and has committed to give $500 million to study artificial intelligence, threw his weight behind Lessin, an investor and former colleague at the social media giant.

Ackman supported a group of four candidates called Renew Harvard, which called for upholding free speech, protecting students from bullying and harassment, and addressing financial mismanagement at the university.

The group pointed to the university’s $50.7 billion endowment delivering a return of 2.9% in fiscal 2023, deeply underperforming the broader market’s nearly 20% gain. Ackman shared this criticism.

The alumni in the Renew Harvard slate were Bedell, an assistant U.S. attorney; entrepreneur Leslie, who buys and runs small businesses at Northern Rock; former Navy officer and investor Williams; and Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter.

“It is clear our message really resonated with the Harvard community given that we were able to get so many votes in just three weeks, so we know these issues are important and will not be abandoning them,” Bedell told Reuters.

The Renew Harvard group plans to try again next year to become write-in candidates on the ballot, Bedell said.

A number of other candidates including historian Todd Fine and attorney Silverglate also mounted campaigns.

The board of overseers is not as powerful as the smaller Harvard Corporation, which has direct oversight over the university’s operations, yet it still exercises influence. The primary tool of the overseers is the so-called visitation process, which lets them ask questions of Harvard’s faculty and departments and carry out assessments.

The last successful challenges came in 2020 and 2021, when Harvard Forward, a coalition of graduates that urged the university’s endowment to divest from fossil fuels, got four candidates elected on the board of overseers.

In 1989, dissident alumni backed a petition to elect Archbishop Desmond Tutu to the board in a push to get Harvard to divest its investment holdings in companies that did business in South Africa during the time of racial apartheid.

(Reporting by Svea Herbst-BaylissEditing by Greg Roumeliotis and Leslie Adler)

• The UK Royal Navy’s fleet flagship had to withdraw from a major NATO exercise at the last minute.

• HMS Queen Elizabeth had issues with its starboard propeller shaft.

• In 2019, HMS Queen Elizabeth was left without propulsion for days and flooded.

HMS Queen Elizabeth, the Royal Navy’s flagship, had to pull out of its role leading the largest NATO exercise since the Cold War at the last minute, the Royal Navy reports.

Routine pre-sailing checks identified an issue with a coupling on the 65,000-ton warship’s starboard propeller shaft, preventing it from sailing on Sunday.

The warship was set to participate in an upcoming NATO exercise but had to be replaced by another UK aircraft carrier, the HMS Prince of Wales.

Despite its standing as the UK Royal Navy’s Fleet Flagship, HMS Queen Elizabeth has suffered a series of embarrassing mishaps since it was commissioned in 2017.

In 2019, a mechanical issue left the warship “without propulsion” for days before it flooded, Portsmouth paper The News reported.

The ship had to anchor off Britannia Royal Naval College for 24 hours to undergo repairs, per The News.

In 2021, one of the carrier’s F-35B fighters crashed in the Mediterranean.

The warship, capable of carrying 60 aircraft, is the largest ever built in the UK costing, £3.1 billion, or $3.9 billion.

HMS Queen Elizabeth was due to set sail from Portsmouth naval base today and serve as the maritime centerpiece of “Steadfast Defender,” the “largest military exercise in Europe since the Cold War,” per NATO’s Strategic Warfare Development Command.

HMS Queen Elizabeth was to lead a carrier strike group of eight ships in the exercise, including US, Spanish, and Danish vessels, in Norwegian waters and the High North, the UK Defense Journal reports.

The elaborate exercise will feature 20,000 UK military personnel deployed across Scandinavia and Northern Europe, per the Royal Navy.

The British contingent is part of 90,000 troops from all 31 NATO allies taking part.

HMS Queen Elizabeth’s replacement, HMS Prince of Wales, also suffered technical issues with its starboard propeller shaft in 2022, which prompted the additional checks on the flagship.

The UK was once the world’s greatest naval power

The forced last-minute cancellation of the HMS Queen Elizabeth’s tour due to a malfunction follows another mishap involving Royal Navy ships.

In January, two UK warships contributing to the Gulf’s maritime security collided at a Bahrain port.

The HMS Chiddingfold and HMS Bangor collided while docking.

Video footage of the latest maritime blunder appeared to show HMS Chiddingfold reversing into HMS Bangor.

The UK was once the world’s greatest naval power but in 2024 the Royal Navy is a shadow of its former self.

Officials and analysts say the Navy is plagued by a shrunken and aging fleet, increasing staff shortages, and rising wear and tear as services are put under strain, the Financial Times reports.

Amid rising staffing issues, the Navy has been lowering entry requirements for recruits to try and bolster its personnel. Recruits no longer need to have graduated from high school or obtained a GED.

“There is a dissonance between the UK’s military ambitions and its capabilities,” Sir Richard Barrons, former head of Britain’s armed forces, said, per the Financial Times. “The risk is that we get drawn into a conflict and can’t sustain our presence, and this exposes a strategic weakness.”

The House of Commons Defence Committee called the UK military “consistently overstretched” and under “unrelenting pressure,” the Independent reports.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Yolanda Saldívar may forever be known as the woman behind the murder of beloved Tejano star Selena Quintanilla-Pérez.

On March 31, 1995, the San Antonio nurse accused of embezzling money from Selena met with the Grammy Award-winning musician at the Days Inn in Corpus Christi, Texas. Shortly before noon, prosecutors said Saldívar — widely painted as an obsessed fan who weaseled her way into managing Selena’s fan club and businesses — fired a single shot into the singer’s back when confronted about stealing funds.

The 23-year-old singer known as “The Queen of Tejano Music” narrowly made it to the motel lobby, identified Saldívar as the shooter, and died a short time later at the hospital.

In the meantime, Saldívar, still armed, retreated to a pickup truck parked at the Days Inn, leading to a nine-plus-hour standoff with police, threatening suicide and claiming Selena’s death was an accident.

Don’t miss the latest in true crime:

Meet the Cast of Peacock’s Upcoming Crime Drama Bosco

Indiana Woman Masterminded the Death of Her Stepfather With Help From Her Own Daughter’s Friends

Shotgun Triple Slaying: Man Killed His Mom, Dad and a Brother To Collect Insurance

Selena’s death — just days before her 24th birthday — sent the music world into a state of grief in what would become one of the industry’s greatest tragedies of all time.

Now, Saldívar is sharing her interpretation of their friendship in the two-part limited series Selena & Yolanda: The Secrets Between Them, which premieres with back-to-back episodes Feb. 17 at 8 p.m. ET/PT and concludes Feb. 18 at 7 p.m. Episodes will be available to stream on Peacock the day after they air.

Yolanda Saldívar’s Job with Selena

Yolanda Saldivar. Photo: Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Selena was on the path to massive international success when she hired an adoring fan Yolanda Saldívar, who insisted on creating a Selena fan club in 1991. Before Selena found stardom with hits such as “Dreaming of You” and “I Could Fall in Love,” Saldívar was an in-home nurse and reportedly called Selena’s father and manager, Abraham Quintanilla, about starting the club.

Prosecutors maintained that Saldívar ingratiated herself into Selena’s life, becoming a trusted family friend.

Saldívar served as the fan club president and was also promoted to manage two of the singer’s Selena Etc. beauty salons: one in Corpus Christi and one in San Antonio.

Associates, including Selena’s personal fashion designer, Martin Gomez, told The Washington Post that Saldívar was challenging to work with.

“She was very vindictive. She was very possessive of Selena,” said Gomez. “She’d get, like, very angry if you crossed her. She would play so many mind games, say people had said things they hadn’t said.”

Prosecutors claimed at trial that Selena’s father discovered Saldívar embezzled $30,000 from the fan club, according to The Washington Post. Per the biography Selena: Como la Flor, written by Texas writer and historian Joe Nick Patoski, Abraham Quintanilla caught wind of the alleged embezzlement after fans paid membership fees and received no merchandise in return.

Per the trial testimony of Selena’s husband, Chris Pérez, the Quintanilla family confronted Saldívar on March 9, and Selena told Saldívar over the phone that she was fired, according to Texas Monthly. However, according to Selena’s sister and boutique employee, Selena decided to fire Saldívar on March 30, one day before the murder.

Prosecutor Mark Skurka said the disgruntled employee “lured” Selena to the Days Inn before fatally shooting her, reported the Washington Post.

Prison Location

Selena Quintanilla-Perez at the 36th Annual Grammy Awards at Radio City Music Hall, New York, New York, March 1, 1994. Photo: Arlene Richie/Getty Images

On October 23, 1995, a Harris County jury found Yolanda Saldívar guilty of first-degree murder. She was subsequently sentenced to life in prison with eligibility for parole after serving 30 years.

According to records viewed by Oxygen.com, the now-63-year-old is currently serving her sentence with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (T.D.C.J.) and housed at the Patrick L. O’Daniel Unit (formerly the Mountain View Unit) for female offenders. The prison is located in Gatesville, Texas, in Coryell County, about 300 miles north of Corpus Christi.

Saldívar is not the only infamous inmate at the facility: the prison also houses nurse-turned-serial killer Kimberly Clark Saenz and former police officer Amber Guyger.

Death row inmates include Darlie Routier — convicted of fatally stabbing her 5-year-old son and charged with killing a 6-year-old son — and Melissa Lucio, who was granted a stay of execution in 2022.

RELATED: Tejano Singer Selena Quintanilla’s Legacy Endures Through Her Music and Fashion

When is Yolanda Saldívar up for parole?

According to T.D.C.J. records examined by Oxygen.com, Saldívar is eligible for parole on March 30, 2025.

As the 30-year milestone of her imprisonment approaches, she plans to pen a letter to the Quintanilla family, pleading with them not to hinder her possible parole, one of Saldívar’s relatives told The Messenger.

“If they stand in her way, she knows her chances of getting out are very slim,” said the source in an October 2023 interview. “She wants to tell them how sorry she is, how much she’s changed. She wants to beg them not to oppose her request.”

Weeks after the interview with Saldívar’s family member, a source close to the Quintanilla family told the outlet they didn’t want to see Selena’s killer free.

“[The family] will do everything in their power to keep her in jail,” said the source. “She was sentenced to life in prison, and she needs to spend her life in prison. Until the day she dies.”

Several factors would have to be considered in the parole board’s decision, such as good behavior and how much time Saldívar has served, according to ABC San Antonio affiliate KSAT-TV.

Neither Saldívar nor the Quintanilla family has directly commented on the convicted killer’s possible parole.

The two-part limited series Selena & Yolanda: The Secrets Between Them premieres with back-to-back episodes Feb. 17 at 8 p.m. ET/PT and concludes Feb. 18 at 7 p.m. Episodes will be available to stream on Peacock the day after they air.

A dead goose was found in part of the flight control system of a medical helicopter that crashed in western Oklahoma, killing all three people on board, according to a preliminary report by the National Transportation Safety Board.

The report does not cite a suspected cause of the crash, but noted one goose was found in the helicopter’s flight control system and others were found in the debris field.

A report on the probable cause could take up to two years to complete, according to the NTSB.

The helicopter crashed Jan. 20 in a pasture near Hydro, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) west of Oklahoma City, as it was returning to Weatherford after taking a patient to an Oklahoma City hospital.

The pilot and both Air Evac Lifeteam crew members, a flight nurse and a paramedic, were killed.

⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious

Porsche Edition: Florida Man strikes again!

Oh Florida, land of alligators and crazy criminal plots. The latest scheme involved Casey William Kelley allegedly making a false banknote to fraudulently purchase a $140,000 Porsche 911 Turbo from a dealership. The 42-year-old man has been charged with grand theft of a motor vehicle and uttering a false banknote, says the Walton County Sheriff’s Office.

According to authorities, Kelley used his home computer and printer to copy and print a convincing-looking cashier’s check. While he’s sitting in jail at the moment and will likely be behind bars for some time, Kelley could have a future in graphic design once he gets out, if he’s looking to live an honest life that is.

Photo credit: Facebook

The dealership, which is located in Destin, Florida had no idea the cashier’s check Kelley provided wasn’t from a bank. With the car keys and title in hand, Kelley happily drove off, likely thinking he would get away with the alleged fraud.

Of course, once the dealership learned the cashier’s check was no good it contacted the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office. Police were on the hunt for their suspect, who surfaced not too long afterward.

With confidence from passing the bad cashier’s check at the car dealership, authorities say Kelley went to a jeweler in Miramar Beach where he presented another one for $61,521 for three Rolex watches. Perhaps having been burned in the past, the jeweler held onto the watches until the check cleared, which it didn’t. Police were then able to track Kelley down and retrieve the Porsche 911 Turbo as well as take him into custody.

Unfortunately, we’ve seen quite a few alleged fraud cases this year, as well as more traditional car thefts. Anyone selling a vehicle, whether a private party or dealer should take steps to protect themselves against the different possible schemes used by would-be criminals.

Source: Fox Business

Sign up for the Motorious Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Saturday Night Live instantly started receiving backlash after Nikki Haley made a surprise appearance during the Feb. 3 show.

During a town hall sketch for the cold open, the Republican presidential candidate made a cameo to ask James Austin Johnson’s Donald Trump some questions of her own.

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Haley started out by asking, “Why won’t you debate Nikki Haley?” in reference to the former president refusing to participate in presidential debates ahead of the 2024 election.

Johnson’s Trump responded, “Oh my God. It’s her, the woman who was in charge of security on Jan. 6. It’s Nancy Pelosi.”

“Are you doing OK, Donald? Haley proceeded to ask. “You might need a mental competency test.”

“You know what, I did,” Johnson’s Trump said. “I took the test and I aced it, OK. Perfect score. They said I’m 100 percent mental and, you know, I’m confident because I’m a man. That’s why a woman should never run our economy. Women are terrible with money.”

Ayo Edebiri later popped up at the end of the sketch and directed a question at Haley: “I was just curious, what would you say was the main cause of the Civil War? And do you think it starts with an S and ends with a lavery?”

The former South Carolina governor said in response, “Yep, I probably should have said that the first time.”

Edebiri’s question was in reference to a December 2023 town hall in New Hampshire, where a voter asked Haley what caused the war. She responded at the time, “I think the cause of the Civil War was basically how government was going to run, the freedoms and what people could and couldn’t do.”

People quickly began to criticize Haley on social media for not mentioning slavery in her response. She ended up walking back her comments during a radio interview on Good Morning New Hampshire, saying, “Of course, the Civil War was about slavery.”

She continued, “What it means to us today is about freedom — that’s what that was all about. It was about individual freedom,” she said. “It was about economic freedom. It was about individual rights.”

Following Haley’s appearance on SNL, some people took to social media to criticize the NBC sketch comedy show for giving her screen time but not other candidates.

One person wrote on X (formerly Twitter), “Nikki Haley will only ever diss trump on a comedy show, and WTF is slavery denier doing on SNL anyway? Disgraceful, @nbcsnl,” while another one added, “Nikki Haley just appeared in the cold open for SNL. Saturday Night Live sure does have a long track record of comedy-washing hateful conservatives.” Trump previously hosted the show in 2015 while running for president for the 2016 election.

NBC declined to comment, but sources told The Hollywood Reporter that NBC will comply with any equal time obligations for other presidential candidates across both parties.

Edebiri made her hosting debut on Saturday Night Live with musical guest Jennifer Lopez.

Best of The Hollywood Reporter

Hundreds of communities across the U.S. have for several decades tried to reduce crime, fight gangs and tackle noise and other neighborhood problems through the use of “crime-free” or “public nuisance” laws encouraging and allowing landlords to evict renters when police or emergency crews are repeatedly called to the same addresses.

Long the subject of criticism that such policies are ineffective and enforced more harshly in poor neighborhoods and against people of color, the ordinances are now under scrutiny as sources of mental health discrimination.

Last November, the U.S. Department of Justice issued what it called a first-of-its-kind finding, telling a Minneapolis suburb that its enforcement of a crime-free law illegally discriminated against people with mental health disabilities.

Other cities and jurisdictions are joining a growing movement to rethink, rewrite or repeal such laws as criticism and lawsuits escalate.

WHAT ARE LOCAL ‘CRIME-FREE’ OR ‘NUISANCE’ ORDINANCES?

Anti-crime and nuisance ordinances have been around for years and are widespread in their usage. More than 2,000 cities nationwide have enacted such policies since the 1990s, according to the Chicago-based Shriver Center on Poverty Law. The International Crime Free Association says at least 3,000 international cities also use them.

Under such ordinances, landlords can be fined or lose their rental licenses if they don’t evict tenants whose actions are considered a public nuisance, including those selling drugs or suspected of other crimes. They also can be required to screen potential tenants and limit the number of people living in a home or apartment.

But every ordinance is different: unique in what it targets, how it is enforced and what kind of consequences are levied for violating it. Many also are vague about who and what is considered a public nuisance.

In Anoka, Minnesota, the Minneapolis suburb scrutinized by the DOJ, the “Crime Free Housing” ordinance covers excessive noise, “unfounded calls to police” and allowing a “physically offensive condition.” While the ordinance says a nuisance call involves “disorderly conduct,” such as criminal activity and acts jeopardizing others, it doesn’t define unfounded calls or physically offensive conditions.

Critics, and courts, say those subjective ambiguities have allowed discrimination against certain groups of people.

WHAT PROBLEMS CAN THESE LAWS POSE?

Federal fair housing laws bar landlords from asking whether someone has a disability, including a mental health disability, or refusing to rent to them on that basis. But many crime-free laws direct landlords to screen rental applicants, sometimes by the same officials who decide whether emergency calls for help or about an individual’s demeanor will count against a tenant or the landlord themself.

Some jurisdictions also share detailed information about those calls with landlords, which housing activists say is often further shared among landlords when discussing why they don’t view a past tenant as a good rental prospect.

One such law in Hesperia, California, spawned a federal lawsuit after a resident was forced to leave her home and move into a motel after calling for assistance when her boyfriend had a mental health crisis. The town’s ordinance required landlords to have potential tenants’ applications screened by the local sheriff’s office. The agency, according to the lawsuit, then shared with landlords a list of people it flagged as potentially troublesome renters.

Advocates say reluctance to rent to people previously hospitalized for mental health issues, as well as city policies that discourage renting to people who have been arrested, exacerbates the situation.

People face being homeless or “forced to cycle from an institution to a homeless shelter,” said Corey Bernstein, executive director of the National Disability Rights Network.

A lack of community services often means jails serve as “de facto psychiatric centers” for people with mental illnesses, said Devon Orland, litigation director at the disability rights Georgia Advocacy Office.

“We’ve seen people on street corners yelling or getting upset,” Orland said. “That locality doesn’t want them around and then they reappear or they don’t leave immediately and they get arrested for criminal trespass.”

WHERE ARE THE LAWS MOST OFTEN ENFORCED?

Critical studies and lawsuits indicate enforcement of nuisance laws frequently occur in poorer neighborhoods and communities of color.

An August 2018 report from the American Civil Liberties Union and New York Civil Liberties Union said data from Rochester and Troy, New York, showed the most vigorous enforcement of “no crime” and “public nuisance” laws occurred in poor and heavily minority areas.

A 2017 federal lawsuit against Peoria, Illinois, similarly plotted three years’ worth of data on a map of the city and found almost all nuisance citations were issued in neighborhoods with larger percentages of residents of color.

Other studies and lawsuits indicate such ordinances are typically in response to an influx of residents of color, often from larger communities such as Cleveland or Los Angeles.

When the DOJ sued Hesperia, a city of about 101,000 residents about 60 miles (97 kilometers) northeast of Los Angeles, in 2019, the agency said officials there had made it clear their ordinance was a reaction to an increasing number of residents of color.

The lawsuit quoted one council member saying “those kind of people” coming from the Los Angeles area were of “no value” and “I want their butt kicked out of this community as fast as I can possibly humanly get it done.”

Other lawsuits have concluded crime-free policies hurt domestic abuse victims for repeatedly calling for help from police.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development filed a complaint in 2013 against the Philadelphia community of Norristown, Pennsylvania, over an ordinance it said allowed the town to sanction landlords over “domestic disturbances that do not require that a mandatory arrest be made.”

A Black resident had filed a federal lawsuit over a series of 2012 incidents involving an abusive boyfriend. She was told by police that she faced eviction over the emergency calls and later did not call police after her boyfriend stabbed her in the neck. A neighbor called police and the woman was airlifted to a hospital for emergency care, the lawsuit said.

WHERE ARE THESE LAWS BEING CHALLENGED?

At least a few states are trying to limit the reach of such ordinances.

Maryland last year prohibited cities and counties from penalizing landlords and now prevents landlords from evicting tenants over the number of police or emergency calls to their addresses. At the start of this year, California greatly limited cities’ use of crime-free policies. Advocates expect a similar push for such legislation in Illinois.

Housing advocates and civil liberties groups also have challenged ordinances in multiple states, including California, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania, forcing cities to rewrite or repeal their ordinances in legal settlements.

Some communities have backed off on their own.

In the Minneapolis area, the communities of Golden Valley, St. Louis Park and Bloomington repealed most or all of their ordinances starting in 2020.

Other area cities have rewritten their ordinances, including Faribault in 2022 as it agreed to pay $685,000 to settle a federal lawsuit over the law.

___

Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.